Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Catalyst Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
  • Other Publications
    • AJEV

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Catalyst
  • Other Publications
    • AJEV
  • Log in
  • Follow Catalyst on Twitter
  • Follow Catalyst on Linkedin
Catalyst

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Catalyst Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
ASEV Catalyst Report

Reducing Sour Rot Spray Applications Initiated after Symptom Development Does Not Impact Disease Control

Patrick Kenney, Megan Hall
Catalyst: Discovery into Practice May 2021 : catalyst.2021.20008; published ahead of print May 25, 2021 ; DOI: 10.5344/catalyst.2021.20008
Patrick Kenney
1University of Missouri, Division of Plant Sciences, Waters Hall, Columbia, MO 65211.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Hall
1University of Missouri, Division of Plant Sciences, Waters Hall, Columbia, MO 65211.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Megan.PondHall@ejgallo.com
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Goals: Previous sour rot research indicates the highest efficacy for sour rot treatments beginning prior to the onset of symptoms, yet many grape growers delay applications until after symptoms develop and continue weekly until harvest, which can exceed four sprays. This number of broad-spectrum insecticide applications is costly both financially and environmentally, and risks developing resistant populations of Drosophila fruit flies. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of a reduced number of spray applications beginning after symptom development, comparing weekly sprays totaling four applications to a reduced number of two to three applications based on Brix levels.

Key Findings:

  • In both years of the trial, when chemical sprays were applied post-sour rot symptom development, more sprays did not equal more control. Reducing the number of post-symptom applications is a substantial cost-saving measure and is beneficial for environmental sustainability.

  • In 2018, there were no significant differences between sour rot severity in both vineyard sites used in the trial. Incidence was significantly lower for the industry standard of weekly applications initiated at 15 Brix until harvest only in one vineyard site compared to applications at 16 and 20 Brix and applications at 16, 19, and 22 Brix.

  • In 2019, there were no significant differences observed in disease severity and incidence between two sprays and weekly applications beginning at 15 Brix in both vineyard sites.

Impact and Significance: Many growers choose to initiate sour rot control applications until after symptoms develop. Weekly applications are financially and environmentally costly and the efficacy of timing applications initiated post-symptom development has yet to be researched. In this study, we show that a reduced number of chemical applications to control sour rot post-symptom development offers the same control as weekly sprays, consistent across both years of the study. Relying on weekly applications initiated only after sour rot symptoms develop does not significantly decrease incidence and severity at harvest. If sour rot symptoms are present, more spray applications do not offer better control.

  • Received August 2020.
  • Revision received January 2021.
  • Revision received February 2021.
  • Accepted March 2021.
  • © 2021 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture. All rights reserved.
Previous
Back to top
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Catalyst.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reducing Sour Rot Spray Applications Initiated after Symptom Development Does Not Impact Disease Control
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Catalyst
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Catalyst web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Reducing Sour Rot Spray Applications Initiated after Symptom Development Does Not Impact Disease Control
Patrick Kenney, Megan Hall
Catalyst: Discovery into Practice  May 2021  catalyst.2021.20008;  published ahead of print May 25, 2021 ; DOI: 10.5344/catalyst.2021.20008

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Reducing Sour Rot Spray Applications Initiated after Symptom Development Does Not Impact Disease Control
Patrick Kenney, Megan Hall
Catalyst: Discovery into Practice  May 2021  catalyst.2021.20008;  published ahead of print May 25, 2021 ; DOI: 10.5344/catalyst.2021.20008
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Catalyst Content

  • Current Issue
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • AJEV
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2022 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 2469-7974.

Powered by HighWire