Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Catalyst Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
  • Other Publications
    • AJEV

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Catalyst
  • Other Publications
    • AJEV
  • Log in
  • Follow Catalyst on Twitter
  • Follow Catalyst on Linkedin
Catalyst

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Catalyst Content
    • Current Issue
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Report

Spur Pruning May Be a Viable Option for Oregon Pinot noir Producers Despite Industry Fears of Lower Productivity

Patricia A. Skinkis, Kelli M. Gregory
Catalyst: Discovery into Practice August 2017 1: 62-72; published ahead of print June 30, 2017 ; DOI: 10.5344/catalyst.2017.17001
Patricia A. Skinkis
1Viticulture Extension Specialist and Associate Professor, Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Patricia.Skinkis@oregonstate.edu
Kelli M. Gregory
2Former graduate student, current Vineyard Manager and Grower Relations, Adelsheim Vineyard, Newberg, OR.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Summary

Goals: Winegrape production is more costly in Oregon than in other US growing regions, and industry faces rising production costs and labor concerns. Growers are considering ways to reduce labor and introduce mechanization. Spur pruning requires less labor and is more readily mechanized than cane pruning; however, the majority of Oregon growers use cane pruning. We conducted industry surveys and interviews to understand why cane pruning is preferred and determine potential barriers to adopting spur pruning. We conducted a vineyard case study to quantify fruitfulness and yield of cane- and spur-pruned vines to determine the potential for spur pruning in Pinot noir.

Key Findings:

  • The majority of survey respondents (76%) primarily used cane pruning on cool climate cultivars because they believe that spur pruning reduces yields and fruit quality and increases fungal and mite pests. A total of 35% believed that spur pruning reduces yield due to vines having unfruitful basal buds.

  • Interviews of Pinot noir growers who use both spur and cane pruning revealed that spur pruning could achieve desired yields, while reducing production costs and labor dependency. Their observations did not support survey respondent concerns about severely reduced yields, fruit quality, and increased mites or diseases.

  • The Pinot noir vineyard case study revealed that cane and spur pruning led to similar yields, cluster size, and fruit ripeness. Data from spur-pruned Pinot noir vines showed that shoots arising from basal, first, and second buds were fruitful.

Impact and Significance: Industry perception and lack of experience with spur pruning is preventing adoption. Expectation of low yields is based on industry hearsay, not direct experience. Concerns that spur pruning lowers quality may be derived from mechanization research from regions that focus on quantity, not quality. However, grower interviews and field data show that Pinot noir is fruitful at basal nodes and can be spur pruned without limiting yield or quality based on Oregon standards. Converting to spur pruning reduced pruning cost, and research/demonstration projects are needed to help small, quality-focused industries make necessary adaptations to their production systems.

  • bud fruitfulness
  • mechanical winter pruning
  • Pinot noir
  • pruning
  • vineyard efficiency
  • yield
  • Received January 2017.
  • Revision received June 2017.
  • Accepted June 2017.
  • Copyright © 2017 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture. All rights reserved.
View Full Text

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 1 Issue 2

Issue Cover
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Catalyst.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spur Pruning May Be a Viable Option for Oregon Pinot noir Producers Despite Industry Fears of Lower Productivity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Catalyst
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Catalyst web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Spur Pruning May Be a Viable Option for Oregon Pinot noir Producers Despite Industry Fears of Lower Productivity
Patricia A. Skinkis, Kelli M. Gregory
Catalyst: Discovery into Practice  August 2017  1: 62-72;  published ahead of print June 30, 2017 ; DOI: 10.5344/catalyst.2017.17001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Spur Pruning May Be a Viable Option for Oregon Pinot noir Producers Despite Industry Fears of Lower Productivity
Patricia A. Skinkis, Kelli M. Gregory
Catalyst: Discovery into Practice  August 2017  1: 62-72;  published ahead of print June 30, 2017 ; DOI: 10.5344/catalyst.2017.17001
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Summary
    • Overview
    • Major Observations and Interpretations
    • Experimental Design
    • Acknowledgments
    • References/Footnotes
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Reducing Sour Rot Spray Applications Initiated after Symptom Development Does Not Impact Disease Control
  • Worth the Hype? Tall Vines Raise Profits for Some – Tradeoffs for All
  • Understanding Smoke Exposure Results: Pinot noir Baseline Concentrations of Smoke Impact Markers across Five Vintages
Show more Report

Similar Articles

Catalyst Content

  • Current Issue
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • AJEV
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 2469-7974.

Powered by HighWire